In art history, “patronage” meant something very specific: powerful individuals, families, religious institutions, or states commissioning works of art and architecture, funding artists, and thereby shaping culture. Think of the Medici family in Florence, or the papacy commissioning Michelangelo, or Isabella d’Este in Mantua gathering together the leading painters of her day. These patrons had the money, the status, and often the political or religious means to demand huge works that conveyed power, belief, prestige, or ideology.

Today, in what feels like a modern renaissance, many of the patrons are not princes, popes, or dukes: they are brands, corporations, fashion houses, luxury labels, even social media platforms. But many of the essential dynamics remain: the funding of art, the shaping of public taste, the cultivation of artists, and, importantly, the recognition and reward for unique voices.

Hey there! 👋 I’m Carrie and I’m here to remind you: you’re already an artist.

Here on Artist Strong, I help creatives stop feeling like a copyist or hobbyist, so they can create their first real series of artwork and build a portfolio they’re proud of.

If you’re ready to stop the DIY learning and get the support and structure to finally draw and paint with your unique voice, I’m here to help.

Sign up and watch my workshop, How to Transform Your Ideas Into Artwork That’s Uniquely Yours. To date, thousands have joined the community. The workshop is completely free, and the link is in the description below.

Today let’s discuss the value of having a unique voice and style, how to brand yourself as an artist, and look at examples today of contemporary patronage.

Historical Background: Patronage in the Renaissance

To understand what is new, it helps to recall what patronage was in the Renaissance and what constraints it placed on artists, and also what freedoms.

• Who were the patrons: In Italy in the 14th–16th centuries, wealthy banking families like the Medicis in Florence (Cosimo, Lorenzo) played huge roles. Also, ecclesiastical patrons (the Church, various Popes, bishops), city-states, nobility. (World History)
• What did they commission: Churches, public buildings, altarpieces, frescoes, sculpture, etc. Sometimes private portraits. The art was often religious or civic in nature; it served both aesthetic purposes and propaganda / status / spiritual functions. (SmartHistory)
• Constraints: Artists often had to satisfy the patron’s demands: iconography, subject matter, style. There was often limited freedom; you might have to adhere to Church doctrine, or the tastes of the patron. Also, artists were socially less powerful; commissions might require deference. They needed patrons for supplies and living expenses. (Khan Academy) 

Example: Lorenzo de’ Medici and Isabella d’Este

• Lorenzo de’ Medici (“Lorenzo the Magnificent”) was less of a direct commissioner in every case but cultivated artists, sponsored humanists, and used patronage heavily to shape Florentine culture. Artists like Botticelli, Verrocchio, Leonardo da Vinci were supported under his circle. (Wikipedia)
• Isabella d’Este, Marquess of Mantua, commissioned works from many leading artists (Bellini, Giorgione, Titian, Raphael, Correggio, etc.). She also collected ancient art. Her “studiolo” (a private study decorated with allegories) shows how patrons could set the themes. She was educated, had her own artistic tastes, corresponded with artists and writers. (Wikipedia)

These relationships shaped what art got made, how it was displayed, and even what styles evolved.

What Does Patronage Look Like Today?

I’ve always been amused at how many creatives today say they don’t want their art to be dictated by the market and at the same time, revere Renaissance artists and/or the idea of patronage. But as we just discussed, having patronage historically hasn’t meant you get to draw or paint whatever you want: it’s almost the exact opposite.

In the 21st century, however, the shape of patronage has changed (and in some ways expanded enormously). What once was limited to elite courts or religious institutions is now accessible through digital media, branding, and global commerce.

Here are a few modern examples that illustrate how “brands as patrons” are empowering artists, often giving them more freedom than many Renaissance artists ever enjoyed.

Contemporary Cases: Artists + Brand Deals

Yayoi Kusama × Louis Vuitton

• Yayoi Kusama, the Japanese artist famous for her polka dots, mirrors, pumpkins, infinity rooms, etc., has collaborated with Louis Vuitton in high-profile ways. Her first major collaboration with the brand was in 2012 under Marc Jacobs, where her signature dots covered handbags, accessories, ready-to-wear, etc. (MyArtBroker)
• More recently (2023), Louis Vuitton relaunched another Kusama collection called Creating Infinity, again using her characteristic visual vocabulary: painted polka dots, mirrored spheres, bold color, and extended beyond just physical goods into store decor, pop-ups, advertising campaigns, even augmented reality filters. (MyArtBroker)
• What this shows is brands paying for the artist’s voice: not just paying someone to replicate style, but giving her space to bring her motifs, worldview, aesthetic. Part of what makes it successful is that Kusama’s vision remains strong and recognizable, across different media (fashion, design, digital). Also, the brand benefits: the collaboration extends authenticity and thus, trust.

Amaury Guichon (“The Chocolate Guy”)

• Amaury Guichon is a pastry chef, sculptor in chocolate, and social media creator. He has built a following via spectacular edible sculptures, technical mastery, and a flair for theatrical visuals. (Instagram)
• He has done brand partnerships where he merges his art form (edible/chocolate sculpture) with brand activations. For example, creating a fully functional oversized replica of a cosmetic product (the Essence Cosmetics Juicy Balm Glossy Butter Balm) made of chocolate, as part of a campaign. (MN2S)
• Also, he has worked with beauty, luxury, sometimes entertainment brands, doing things that are visually compelling, often viral, and strongly tied to his skill set and voice. He is selective: choosing brands that align with his values, that allow him creative control. (Roastbrief US)

CJ Hendry

• CJ Hendry is known for hyper-realistic drawings of everyday objects, often product packaging, luxurious or mundane items, played out in large format. Her audience is large on social media. (Hospitality Design)
• In recent years she has been doing immersive public art (“Flower Market,” “Public Pool,” etc.), pop-ups, collaborations, and brand partnerships (for example with Clé de Peau Beauté in Flower Market) where the brand becomes part of the exhibition. (The Spaces)
• Importantly, she emphasizes creative control: she doesn’t want to simply produce what the market demands. She wants authentic expression, series of work, thematic consistency, evolving concepts. She reinvests her income, keeps pursuing ideas. (Hospitality Design)

I really hope these examples give you that permission you seek to ignore the market and create art exactly on your terms. Because when you make art that is uniquely yours, it can open the door to collaborations and contemporary patronage opportunities.

Comparing Old and New Patronage

So indeed, many artists today have more freedom than many Renaissance artists ever had. Michelangelo, for example, worked under significant constraints from the Church, including specific subject matter, composition, even deadlines. 

The Sistine Chapel ceiling is the perfect example of this; Michelangelo did not want this project. He is famously quoted as saying, “I’m no painter,” but refusing the Pope was not an option. While his skill and vision are unquestionable, the conditions were not ones of pure self-expression.

Why This Matters: Unique Voice, Series, Style

One key undercurrent is that brands today are often hiring artists because of their unique voice, not despite it. That means:

• If you have a consistent style, visual language, or conceptual voice, you are more likely to attract brand partnerships that respect that voice, rather than dilute it.
• Artists who explore work in series: developing themes, motifs, techniques over time, can build recognition. Once an audience comes to recognize your style, the brand value of the signature increases.
• The alignment of values matters. Brands need credibility, especially now when consumers demand authenticity, ethical behavior, etc. Artists who stand for something: whether it’s craft, sustainability, identity, innovation, can partner in ways that reflect that.

This is why I teach my free class How to Transform Your Ideas Into Artwork That’s Uniquely Yours. I want you to see how both skill and personal interests can intersect to create unique art that doesn’t keep you stuck with one style for life, but becomes evidence of your progression over time as an artist. And that consistency through a series will give you credibility and professionalism that can open doors you’ve never considered.

How Artists Can Apply This if They Wish to Sell Their Art / Seek Brand Patronage

If you are an artist wanting to tap into this new era of patronage, here are some strategies and considerations:

1. Build and protect your unique voice & style
   • Work in series: explore motifs, materials, concepts through several works. This helps your audience see patterns and your brand (as an artist) develop. Also, working in series allows you to have a beginning, middle and end for each project that also allows you to explore new ideas and materials in a new series.
   • Be clear about what your values are: what you believe in, processes, materials, political/social stances, aesthetic concerns. If a brand approaches, you can better judge whether they align.
2. Create visibility & audience
   • Use social media, digital platforms, video, performance, installations, public exhibitions. Each increases awareness. Please don’t assume you have to be everyone. Choose one to rock out on and then if time or additional help allows, consider adding another. I highly recommend you have an email list: you don’t own Instagram or TikTok and as we all know the algorithm keeps changing, which decides who does (or doesn’t) see our work.
   • Document your work: behind the scenes, your tools, your thinking, this gives texture and authenticity. This gives you great imagery and stories to share via email and social.
3. Seek collaborations early, but selectively
   • Small brand partnerships or local businesses can help build a track record. What is one local store or small brand that might be a good partnership for your art? Tell me in the comments below.
   • But don’t compromise on alignment: if a brand’s values or aesthetic clash with yours, the risks: loss of artistic integrity, alienating your audience, may be worse than not doing the deal.
4. Negotiate for creative freedom
   • When entering into agreements, try to stipulate who controls what: final design, copy, product, display. Ask for input.
   • Protect your voice: understand that market relationships don’t always or immediately reflect the true value of your efforts. We conflate the time we put into work into immediate market value, but that isn’t always the case. You may start with a barter, for example, to get comfortable with the process and build experience advocating for yourself and your art.
5. Diversify income & patron types
   • Brands are one form of patronage; galleries, grants, commissions, residencies all remain relevant.
   • Having multiple revenue streams gives leverage, you’re less likely to need to accept misaligned brand deals if you have other funding or sales.
6. Think about scale & reproducibility
   • Limited edition products, prints, wearable or usable goods (fashion, design) often let artists partner with brands to reach broader audiences.
   • But beware of over-saturation which may dilute both brand and artist’s uniqueness (as in some critiques of huge brand/artist collaborations).

Why Artists Now Often Have More Freedom than Artists like Michelangelo

• Ownership of audience: Through social media and the internet, many artists can build their own audience directly, rather than entirely depending on patrons to promote them.
• Choice of patron: There are more patrons now (brands, private clients, corporate foundations, online markets) so artists can choose the ones that align with their voice.
• Diverse media and modes: Artists are no longer limited to painting frescoes or altarpieces; they can do installations, digital, performance, fashion, sculpture, edible art, collaborations, etc.
• Global reach and impact: Thanks to distribution (online sales, shipping) and digital exposure, an artist today can reach audiences worldwide even with small-scale works.
• Legal & economic protections: Intellectual property, contracts, branding, all of which offer more protection and scope for commercial use, licensing, etc.

Challenges & Potential Pitfalls

It’s not all perfect. Some concerns:

• Brand partnerships may demand compromise, sometimes pushing artists toward more commercial, less challenging work.
• Overexposure can dilute an artist’s mystique or distinctiveness. If every major brand wants a piece, the “exclusivity” aspect can suffer.
• Not all deals are equal: some brands treat artists well, others try to exploit social media popularity without fair compensation. Contracts are super important to protect yourself. And document, document, document to help protect you and your work.
• The balance between artistic integrity and financial sustainability can be delicate.

Why This “New Renaissance” Is Celebratory, and Why It Needs Artists Like You

This shift is reason to celebrate.

• It rewards authenticity: Artists who have developed something deeply personal, consistent, or unusual are now more likely to be valued for that.
• It democratizes patronage: Rather than being available only to elite courts, funding and platforms are available to many more creators, often globally.
• It expands what art can be: collaborations blur boundaries: art/design/fashion/food/experience/digital.
• It gives artists more control: more choices, more direct relationships with audiences, more ability to decline misaligned offers.

For you (or any artist reading or watching), the takeaway is that embracing and developing your unique voice, building a body of work (series, themes, motifs), and seeking visibility on your own terms can position you to benefit from this new patronage. It’s not about becoming commercial for its own sake: it’s about having leverage, options, and the ability to say this is my art, this is how I do it.

On “Selling Out”: Why Success Shouldn’t Mean Shame

A common criticism hurled at artists who collaborate with brands is the charge of being a “sell-out.” This judgment often comes not from audiences genuinely betrayed, but from fellow artists or commentators frustrated by their own struggles. Yet if we look at history, patronage has always been the engine that allowed art to flourish. Michelangelo painting the Sistine Chapel ceiling under Pope Julius II wasn’t an act of pure independence: he was under contract, dictated subject matter, and facing deadlines. Was he a sell-out? Few would dare suggest so.

Today, when artists like Yayoi Kusama, Takashi Murakami, or others work with brands, they aren’t abandoning their voice: they’re expanding it. These collaborations succeed precisely because the artist’s identity is intact and recognizable. If anything, it takes courage to remain true to your vision in the face of corporate expectations, and skill to negotiate partnerships that respect your values.

Banksy, the street artist, has addressed this tension directly. One of his quotes captures it well:

“I tell myself I use art to promote dissent, but maybe I am just using dissent to promote my art. I plead not guilty to selling out. But I plead it from a bigger house than I used to live in.” (Quote.org)

This quote is powerful because it acknowledges the grey area: yes, there’s an interplay between dissent or social statement and art as commerce; but Banksy asserts that even if one is using their voice as a platform, that doesn’t make them a sell‐out. In fact, he takes pride in success, “a bigger house than I used to live in” doesn’t hide but owns the fact of his material gains.

To imply that artists who succeed financially through their art deserve to lose respect is to punish them for solving the very problem so many struggle with: how to fund their work while staying authentic. Instead, they deserve more respect for demonstrating that artistic integrity and financial sustainability can coexist. In fact, their visibility opens doors for others, showing the next generation that embracing one’s unique voice is not only possible but valued.

Why Artists Who Find Brand Relationships Should Be Respected, Not Judged

Putting together the above, there are several reasons why successful artists who partner with brands, when done with integrity, deserve respect:

1. They solve a hard problem. Many artists struggle to support themselves financially. Those who find ways to fund their work are doing the difficult work of sustaining creativity while navigating real economic constraints.
2. They show it’s possible. When artists succeed on their own terms, it becomes a model. It expands what people believe is possible: others can see that you don’t have to choose between values and sustainability.
3. Authenticity can increase with success. Contrary to the idea that success demands selling out, many artists actually gain more leverage once they are established: more freedom to say no, more choice in partners, more ability to push their vision and demand better terms.
4. Voice is not extinguished by commerce; it can be amplified. When your voice is heard widely: via collaborations, brand platforms, merchandise, larger shows, you can reach more people with what you believe in. Brand deals can carry risks, but they can also be megaphones for authenticity.
5. Criticism of “selling out” often comes from insecurity or romanticizing hardship. It’s easy to valorize struggling artists or suffering for art. But we should avoid penalizing someone for choosing success, for doing the work, for having impact, and yes, making money, while still being true to themselves.

Conclusion

We may indeed be living in a New Renaissance. Brands have become important patrons, but unlike many Renaissance patrons, they often pay artists because of their unique voice, not despite it. Artists today have more tools, more platforms, and more direct connection to audiences than at any other moment in history. That means more control, more choice, and more opportunity to shape culture on your own terms.

The challenge is not whether artists will “sell out” but whether they will stand strong in their own vision while navigating an abundance of options. Patronage, old and new, has always involved negotiation. Michelangelo bent under papal demands even as he changed the course of Western art. Kusama negotiates with global fashion houses while retaining her dots, pumpkins, and obsessions. Murakami moves between galleries, luxury brands, and streetwear, bringing his characters to life across every platform imaginable. Each shows us that integrity doesn’t vanish with visibility: it can deepen, if the artist insists on it.

And perhaps this is the most hopeful part of our New Renaissance: it is far more democratic. You don’t need to be in Florence under Medici rule to have patrons. You can share your work online, find your audience, and attract supporters who resonate with what you uniquely offer. A brand deal might be one path, but so too are collectors, local businesses, community projects, grants, or simply the people who choose to follow and fund you.

The idea that an artist should be punished socially for succeeding, labeled a “sell-out” or dismissed as commercial, is itself a relic of an old myth: that the only “true” artist is the starving one. But what if the opposite is true? What if sustaining yourself is actually an act of radical artistic integrity? What if the visibility and security you earn allows you to create more boldly, to inspire others to do the same, and to push art further than you ever could while merely surviving?

This is the power of the New Era of Patronage. It rewards authenticity, it expands opportunity, and it insists that artists deserve not only to create but to thrive. And if we choose to embrace it: if we claim our voices, develop our series, and build our audiences, then like the Renaissance before it, this moment could be remembered as a golden age of artistic transformation.

Thanks so much for watching. If you enjoyed today’s topic, please like and subscribe to Artist Strong. And tell me something new you’ll use in your art practice in the comments below.

Remember: proudly call yourself an artist.

Together, we are Artist Strong.